Problems Of Modern Youth Essay

It has been rightly said that we deteriorate the first half of our lives trying to understand the senior generation, and the second half trying understand the littleer generation. This is nothing peculiar to the modern mature. It has incessantly so been so. every age has its own problem Youth has al ways felt m any(prenominal)what exasperated with age, and age In always been suspicious of younker. With their natural ebullience a impatience, a majority of recent pot is shrewd to act and listen on the own rather than be guided by the experience of their elders. The ok people, cosmos more(prenominal) at home with lecture rather than with action, oft make noises close to the problems of youth. In every generation, one- prison term(a) men ar base shaking their hoary heads and waxing nostalgic about I good old days when young people knew better and showed due reverence to age and tradition. In all ages, whenever they dupe pondered over ways of youth, they have foresee n nothing simply ruination perfect(a) the world in its face. And yet the world goes on. any generation passes from spontaneity and exuberance of youth to the tending and prudence of old age, and then yields place to the next. many of the charges brought against modern youth atomic number 18 that they re take a rudderless generation without any ideals to live by, or cause to live for. Without the redeeming influence of faith, they be afflicted with a compulsive reverence which manifests itself in increasing defiance of p arntal potential and repulse against established social, example and behavioral norms. On the slightest dissimulation they take to the streets, indulging in violence and demolition. They miss to attract attention to themselves through unconventional behaviour and clothes. A majority of them have fallen victims to self-pity, mister med as alienation. They atomic number 18 be culmination a generation of drug addicts and have developed an aversion to ho nest, hard work, ever on the lookout to have something for nothing. It is no yearner anxious youth going forrader into a hostile world.Now, it is hostile youth going forth into an anxious world, which is not sure, what to expect from it. This is a terrible list of charges and it will require an army of psychologists to go out the truth of the allegations made and to analyze the erratic behaviour patterns referred to. But even from the laymans institutionalise of view, the indictment appears to be patently one-sided. It betrays a lack of sympathetic understanding and realistic appreciation of the predicament in which the younger generation begets itself today. If we come to designate of it,it is not that only the younger generation is hint restless. As a matter of fact, human partnership itself is in a state of flux. And that is not a recent development. A profound change has been coming over it for the last quarter of a century. It started with those who had fought in the S econd world War. They had been brought up in an automated teller machine impregnated by conformism. But later they had borne the brunt of fighting for 7 long historic period, their outlook was radically changed.They came to acquire a rather equivocal attitude towards established way as likewise towards long-accepted social mores and codes of conduct. They had seen the goal and destruction shaped by the war. It diminished their respect for the intelligence of old age because it was the old mentheir fatherswho had started the war. The catastrophes of death and destruction, which had visited the world twice in thirty years eloquently, showed that the old had bungled, and that their claims to matur wisdom were false. Then the general erosion of law and order, which is natural in eons of war, wrought a profound change in the savor of the age. An attitude of dissent and irreverence came to replace natural faith and quiet acceptance of the status quo. Thus, it was the old peop le themselves who sowed the seeds of that arrogance of which they complain so bitingly while discussing modern youth.A fast-growing populations has change magnitude to complexities of lifetime in our times and the fantastic proficient progress triggered off by the Second dry land War. These two factors combined have brought about capital socio-political changes during the last three decades, both in the industrialised countries of the west and in the underdeveloped countries in Asia and Africa. developing affluence in the developed societies of the West has generated among the people there a restlessness, which pines for instant rewards. Pursuing the mirage, parents have little time to devote to their children and to properly aim and supervise their activities. The children have all the money they need, and seldom face the need to work for a living. The issuing is that they try to attract attention in separate ways and seek excitement in drugs and permissiveness. In the un derdeveloped countries also, young people are smell disgruntled because their visions of a happy future are being obliterated either by inhering strife or by political opportunism. actually few among such countries are enjoying political stability and even in them, more often than not, it is a particular class which is cornering most of therewards of technological progress. This provokes the young to protest against rampant corruption in beau monde and the denial of social justice. In the circumstances, is it to be wondered at if all talk of dedication to ideals, renewed virtuous vigour, basic virtues etc. leaves the young cold and unconvinced? They are no all-night hustling to blindly accept whatever their elders choose to ram atomic matchor their throats. They are prone to subject to critical round off all the social and political values they are called upon to accept. When they see high-sounding principles invariably being cut for expediency, political leaders delibera tely hoodwinking the masses, vested interests being allowed to gravel the state at every step, corruption universal in high places and other gaping differences surrounded by promise and performance, they naturally become cynical and express for change. Students form a very important radical among the youth of all nations.Like the others in the very(prenominal) age group, they too have ample tenableness to be dissatisfied with the state of affairs in our educational institutions. Their biggest and most legitimate grievance is that what they learn after putting in so more than time, effort and money has very little relevance to the realities of life with which they come face to face after leaving the university. Rather than equipping them to make a honourable living, education appears to be rendering them unemployable. Therefore, it is but natural that they should want to have a submit in determining what should be taught so that it has some relevance to their future life and its needs. They would no longer tolerate politickers masquerading as teachers. They are not prepared to concede that the educational authorities have also to act as the guardians of their morals. They consider themselves quite able of looking after themselves. If we look at the problems of youth today in the light of foregoing, it will be apparent that it is not the young alone who are to blame for the state of mind in which we ascend them.They may well be charged with being ignorant of what they want. But they surely know what they do not want. Theirs is a movement of protest against lip service and lack of integrity in their elders, an brass of moral revulsion against corruption in society. Students are up in arms against displays of hollow pedantry and alienated recognition in educational institutions, the lack of living clutch between students and teachers, and the unresponsiveness of the whole educational system to the need for change. The young are protesting against t he difference between themyth and reality of the society in which they are growing. Evidently, this concern for the future and this anxiety to rescue life from hypocrisy is very laudable indeed. But it cannot be said that the young are all the time guided by such high purpose, or that their choice of methods is always happy. Dissent is necessaryin fact obligatory, when things go wrong. But when it descends from the verbal take to the physical, it invites tragedy.Violence comes natural to youth. The young, supremely sure that the authority against which they are up in arms is foul and oppressive, and feeling certain of the correctness of their own stand, react emotionally. The intensity of their feelings is such that it fills them with hatred and they turn to violence. Those who propose taking to the streets to give vent to feelings of grievance aver that no one pays attention to words any longer. But this way of thinking is dangerous. Violence is an expression of intolerance. As the President of the Yale University said some time ago, the nefariousness of the radical is no different from the ugliness of the reactionary. Both share the sin of arrogance, which is the enemy of freedom. In a general unleashing of violence, dissent is the first casualty.On the whole, the younger generation today is much see and more maligned than it deserves. The world, which it is going to inherit, will be immensely more exciting than the world of its predecessors ever was or could be. At the same time, life will present to it a much bigger and far more complex challenge. It would not do to condemn it and find fault with it that is easy enough. What is really important is that it is inured with understanding so that it can develop its faculties to reshape the world it is going to inherit in conformity with its noblest vision.